Building America HomeBuilding America Industrialized Housing PartnershipBAIHP - Conducted by FSEC

Building America Home

You are here: > BAIHP > Publications > BAIHP Annual > Appendix D (Cont'd)
FSEC Online Publications
Reference Publication:   Chandra, Subrato, Neil Moyer, Danny Parker, David Beal, David Chasar, Eric Martin, Janet McIlvaine, Ross McCluney, Andrew Gordon, Mike Lubliner, Mike McSorley, Ken Fonorow, Mike Mullens, Mark McGinley, Stephanie Hutchinson, David Hoak, and Linda Tozer. Building America Industrialized Housing Partnership, Annual Report - Fourth Budget Period. 04/01/03-03/31/04.
Building America Industrialized Housing Partnership, Annual Report - Fourth Budget Period

Building America Industrialized Housing Partnership (BAIHP)
TRIP REPORT
Southern Mississippi
Problem Home Inspection, Testing and Possible Solutions

DATE
August 9, 2001

PURPOSE

  • Assist service and engineering staff in determining the source or probable cause of moisture-related problems and aid in repairs.
  • Provide confirmation, if possible, that moisture related problems would not reappear.

INTRODUCTION

  • Moisture problems included some discoloring of wallboard and staining of ceiling trim at various transitions.  Also, a section of wallboard near the front door had deteriorated from water intrusion.
  • Previously damaged wallboard had been replaced once already by service personnel.  Repairs included replacing with damage drywall with a similar product, repairing supply duct system leakage and sealing wall-ceiling penetrations.

DESCRIPTION

  • 3 bedroom-2 bath 1330 ft2 singlewide with fireplace.
  • Open crawlspace without skirting
  • 3 ½ ton split system AC and electric strip heat furnace with an in-line metal floor duct system with metal risers.

OBSERVATIONS

  • Thermostat was set at 75F
  • Repairs previously made included wallboard replacement, duct sealing (with mastic), and sealing of various ceiling transitions.
  • Blend-Air II ventilation system installed.  The attic ventilation fan had been disconnected.
  • Homeowner reported that the electric bill for the summer decreased by $40 after the repairs were made.
  • All bedroom doors usually closed at night and open during the day.
  • Occupants include 2 adults, 2 teenagers and 4 pets (2-cats and 2 dogs).

TESTING

Blower door test

A blower door test was done to determine the airtightness of the building envelope.  A series of building pressures and associated airflows was recorded.  This provides the necessary inputs to determine the CFM50 of the house.  As a general rule of thumb, typical values of building airtightness range between 0.75 and 1 CFM50 per square foot of conditioned floor area.  This house has a floor area of 1216 ft2 and a CFM50 of 1855 or 0.7 CFM50 per square foot – a tighter home.

Blower Door Test –As Found

CFM50 = 1855

[C=163.1, n=0.62, r=0.99]

The values of C and n can be used as inputs for the house airflow equation, Q=C* pn.  Thus, for any given pressure difference,  P, the airflow crossing the building’s envelope can be determined.

Duct test

A duct system airtightness test was also completed.  A duct tester was attached to the air handler unit.  The supply registers were temporarily sealed off and the system was then depressurized to 25 pascals.  The total and outside leakage flow components were measured.  An airtight duct system would have zero leakage or both the CFM25total and CFM25out would be 0.

Duct System Airtightness

CFM25total  = 47

CFM25out  = 32


Pressure diagnostic testing

Pressure differential measurements were completed to determine a magnitude and direction of flow across the envelope when the air handler fan operates.  Interior door closure effect was also measured when the air handler fan operated. 

Pressure Diagnostics w/ AHU

(Note: the winds were calm)

Condition

Pressure differential (main wrt outside)

All fans off

0 pa

AHU on

-1.6 pa

AHU on & master suite door closed

-10.7 pa

AHU on & all interior doors closed

-13.0 pa

The pressure difference was also measured across each closed door when the air handler fan was operating (all supply registers were open and exhaust was off).

Pressure across closed doors

Pressure differential (room wrt main)

Master bedroom

24.5 pa

Center Bedroom

3.9 pa

End Bedroom

6.6 pa

EFFECTS

  • Return air path to AHU is hindered when bedroom doors are closed – especially the master suite door.
  • Flow imbalances cause the master bedroom to be overcooled before the other bedrooms are cooled.  This overcooling causes the exterior vinyl covered walls to drop to the ambient air dewpoint temperature or below.
  • Duct leakage, on the supply side, causes the entire building to operate at a negative pressure.  Any pathway from the exterior to the interior – such as electrical penetrations- provides a pathway for ambient air to reach interior surfaces.  One such area is at the light fixture mounted on the wall of the master bath.

RECOMMENDATIONS

  • Keep thermostat set at 78 F or above.
  • The flow imbalances (especially the excessive air in the master suite) should be corrected.
  • All duct leaks should be repaired with mastic.  The supply plenum and all risers should be checked and repaired as needed.  The refrigerant line penetration through the air handler cabinet should also be sealed.  The duct leakage should not exceed 3% of floor area or CFM25 less than 40.
  • The 3-inch reducer in the supply plenum should be removed.
  • A separate return direct to the AHU is needed (through the wall or jump duct) from the master suite.
  • Sufficient return air pathways should be installed in the rest of the bedrooms.
  • All belly penetrations should be sealed with a permanent, long-lasting seal. No duct tape.
  • In general, vinyl covered exterior drywall should not be used in hot and humid climates.

PICTURES

Front elevation

Rear elevation

Compliance sticker

Blower door assembly

Duct tester attached to furnace

Thermostat

Outside air duct to furnace top

Furnace fan removed to inspect plenum

Electric furnace with 3-row AC coil

AC nameplate

Ceiling transition repair being made

Inspecting wall moisture content

AC condensate draining on pier and ponding

Eroded pier support under hall bath

Close-up eroded pier support



Disclaimer: This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States government or any agency thereof.

Home | Overview | Activities | Team Members | Case Studies
Current Data | Publications | Researchers | Contact Us


Copyright © 2004 Florida Solar Energy Center. All Rights Reserved.

Please address questions and comments regarding this web page to BAIHPMaster