| II.
                        BAIHP Technical Assistance (D-E)
 
Dukane
                      PrecastNaperville, Illinois
 
|  |  
|  Figure
                              13 Completed
                        Dukane Precast home tested by BAIHP
 |  FSEC
                      made a February 2002 site visit to Dukane Precast in Naperville,
                        Illinois and provided technical design assistance in
                    a follow-up telephone conference call in March ‘02.  In
                      2003, Dukane Precast requested BAIHP assistance in the
                      design phase and monitoring of the first prototype of a
                      new line of homes called “The Fortified
                            House (Figure
                            13). Objectives of Dukane’s Fortified
                            House include energy efficiency, comfort, durability,
                            and good indoor environment conditions. In December 2003, FSEC visited 3 prototype buildings
                          in various stages of construction in. One was complete.
                          Researchers made recommendations regarding window flashing,
                          below grade drainage and waterproofing, interior ducts,
                          air sealing, attic access detail, floor finishes with
                          radiant heating, radiant heat zoning, ventilation system
                        design and operation. In
                      February, FSEC returned to Dukane for testing and infrared
                      evaluation of 3 completed prototype Fortified Homes built
                      by Dukane’s
                      sister company, Mustang Construction at Keller Court, Boilingbrook,
                      IL, just west of Chicago.  Infrared
                      images were recorded from the inside and outside during
                      a calm morning with ambient air temperature of about 25 º F and interior temperatures of about
                          70 º F, and whole house air tightness was assessed
                          with a blower door test. Whole house infiltration was
                          ACH50=1.28 (very low) 11 Keller Court data (Specifications,
                          Table 11) was obtained with a multipoint blower
                        door test. IR scans found no major infiltration pathways. 
| Table
                            11 Dukane Precast’s Fortified Home Specifications |  
|  Component |  Dukane Home  |  
|  Conditioned area  |  5100 (with basement)  |  
|  HERS score  |  NA  |  
| Envelope  |  
|  Floors and Ceiling  |  Precast concrete panels  |  
|  Walls  |  R-23
                            (~3") Polyisocyanurate between
                          precast concrete  |  
|  Attic  |  Vented with R-38 Polyisocyanurate and
                          Batt  |  
|  Windows  |  Insulated glass, vinyl frame, u-value=0.36,
                          SHGC=0.45  |  
|  Infiltration  |  Ach50=1.28  |  
| Equipment  |  
|  Heating  |  Radiant floor  |  
|  Boiler  |  140kBtu, 50 gallon AFUE=92 Gas Boiler  |  
|  Cooling  |  3 ton, 10 SEER, Unico-type  |  
|  Ducts  |  High velocity, small ducts, unconditioned
                          space  |  
|  Thermostat  |  Programmable  |  
|  Ventilation  |  Honeywell 150cfm HRV  |  
|  Water Heating  |  From Boiler  |  The ceiling and gable end of the vaulted living room
                          were built with wood frame construction instead of precast
                          concrete. Both showed higher heat loss than was generally
                          found in the precast panels. Flaws in the continuity
                          of ceiling insulation over the vaulted ceiling were visible
                          from the vented attic. especially around can lights.
                          The flat ceilings in this home were insulated with R-38
                          rigid polyisocyanurate loosely laid on the concrete ceiling
                          panels. Dukane has now switched to an R-23 precast panel
                        for ceilings.  Opportunities for Improvement  
|  |  
|  Figure
                              14  IR-scan
                            showing metal trusses in precast walls. Temperature
                            at the crosshairs is 20.2 ° F.
                            Overlaid temperature graph shows temperature variation
                            of the surfaces at the white line running horizontally
                      through the crosshairs.  |  Infrared scans were performed on the ranch home and two
                    other homes nearing completion on Keller Court. All three
                    had the space heating system in operation holding the interior
                    near 70 F. Initial scans of the exterior clearly showed increased
                    heat conduction at the truss locations in the precast panels (Figure
                    14). The metal truss members are cast into the assembly
                    to connect the interior and exterior panels and allow for
                    approximately 3 inches of polyisocyanurate foam (R-23). Exterior
                    infrared scans showed a 2 - 4º F temperature rise at
                    truss locations; exterior temperatures were between 12º and
                    24ºF. Increased heat loss was also visible at the top and bottom
                    of precast sections where field connections are made during
                    construction and filled with grout. Each panel has at least
                    two lifting fasteners imbedded in the top edge for the crane
                    to connect to during home construction. Foam insulation around
                    these fasteners is sometimes removed to connect the lifting
                    hook and the void is re-insulated in the field. Insulation
                    levels are reduced where precast walls are connected to floors
                    and ceilings. These areas have one inch of rigid XPS foam
                    (R-5) next to the outer panel but are otherwise left open
                    until structural and electrical conduit connections are made
                    in the field after which they are filled with grout.  Interior Ducts and Moisture Issues  FSEC Researchers met with Dukane Precast staff, their architect
                    and mechanical contractor to identify a way to incorporate
                    interior ducts into a new model of the Fortified House. Ducts
                    are used primarily for cooling and ventilation as all Dukane
                    Precast homes are designed with in-floor radiant heat driven
                    by a high efficiency (92 AFUE) boiler. The boiler also provides
                    domestic hot water in conjunction with a 50-gallon storage
                    tank.  The main obstacle to building interior ducts was finding
                    a place to run ducts from the basement mechanical room to
                    the first and second floors. Agreement was made to run supply
                    risers near the center of the home and returns in a chase
                    on an outside. The two-story foyer offers the best placement
                    for a central return for both the first and second floor
                    supplies.  Dukane is currently using a high velocity, small duct air
                    conditioning system by Unico with 2-inch diameter supply
                    branches that are easier to fit into walls and chases than
                    low velocity ducts. One unoccupied home had problems with
                    condensation accumulating on the attic-mounted ducts. The
                    cause was traced to humid indoor air contacting cold metal
                    trunk lines in the vented attic.  No occupant-related moisture was present but the precast
                    panels, which are still in the process of drying, are one
                    possible source. Periodic mixing of the indoor air may be
                    all that is required until moisture output from the panel
                    is reduced. Otherwise, introducing dry air was recommended
                    to prevent condensation. Findings and recommendations were
                    sent of the Dukane Precast in a Trip Report.
 
Dye
                          Company and DelAir - Southern Living HomeCategory
                          A, 1 Home
 Category B, 1 Home
 Florida
                      H.E.R.O. met with Dye Company president and his staff to
                      discuss the new Southern Living Home planned for showcase
                        at the 2003 Southeast Building Conference (SEBC) in Orlando,
                              Florida. This firm has a strong desire to differentiate
                              their homes by emphasizing healthy and energy efficient
                              homes. Florida HERO introduced the Building America
                              systems engineering approach to the builder and
                    subsequent discussions resulted in Dye’s commitment
                            to partner with Building America in this project.
                    As a result, researcher met with DelAir mechanical contracting
                            to discuss the development of mechanical specifications
                            for the Southern Living project.  This home did have a Honeywell ERV added and had a HERS
                          score of 88.5. While this home did not meet the BA standard
                          of performance for the 2003 SEBC show, retrofits were
                        being completed to bring it up to BA performance level. The 2004 home achieved a HERS of 89.6. Both homes have
                          unvented attics with ducts in conditioned space, and
                          used heat pumps with SEERs ranging from 13.5 - 14.1.
                          Windows in the 2004 home had a SHGC of .29 and gas (LP)
                        instant hot water heaters were used.
 
 EnergyGauge® USA FSEC - Cocoa, Florida
 
|  |  
| Figure 15  Window input
                          screen from EnergyGauge USA home energy rating and
                      simulation software. |  This software
                      uses the hourly DOE 2.1E engine with FSEC enhancements and
                      a FSEC-designed user friendly front end to calculate home
                      energy ratings and energy performance. (Figure 15) Researchers
                      continue to improve the software’s features and accuracy.
                      Version 2.0 incorporates many enhancements, which may include
                      multiple zones, multi-fuel use, and a detailed solar thermal
                      and solar electric system analysis. For more information,
                      please visit  www.energygauge.com
                      .        |