1.1
                          FSEC Technical Assistance
- All America Homes of Gainesville
 
 
All America Homes has been in business for 17 years and builds
                  10 homes each year in the Gainesville (FL) area. After providing
                  design assistance for the award wining 2002 home (Figure
                    3) during the 4 th budget period, BAIHP provided additional
                    assistance to All America for a second home with solar and
                    energy efficiency concepts during the 5 th budget period.
                    The home was built with a photovoltaics (PV) system, and
                  achieved a HERS rating of 90.6.  
 | 
 
|   Figure 3 All America Homes
                            of Gainesville, 2003 Energy Value Housing Award,  
                          Silver
                      Medal, Custom Home/Hot Climate.   | 
 
 
This home serves as a model
                      for the hot-humid climate using a combination of on-site
                      power generation and energy efficiency to reach near-zero
                      utility demand, similar to the home built in 2002 (Table 3). 
It incorporates energy efficient air conditioning, hydronic solar
                  water heating, excellent air distribution design and construction
                  (pressure tested for validation) and right sizing of the heating
                  and cooling capacity. It also incorporates envelope improvements
                  in the roof, ceiling, walls, windows and infiltration control.
                  A passive fresh sir ventilation system provides filtered outside
                  air to the return side of the mechanical system during operation.
                See Appendix C, Florida H.E.R.O. Standard Technical Specifications.  
Table 3 All America
                          Homes of Gainesville (FL) Specifications   | 
 
| Component | 
2002 Home   | 
2003 Home   | 
 
| Conditioned Area  | 
3644 sq ft  | 
2884 sq ft | 
 
| Hers Score  | 
90.6 | 
90.6 | 
 
| Utility Cost  | 
$150 for summer (including water, sewer, and trash pickup)
                         
                      (Source: Homeowner records)  | 
Average summer energy use = 58kw/day (Source: Gainesville
                      Regional Util.) | 
 
| Solar: PV Array  | 
2.5 kW  | 
1.8 kW  | 
 
| Solar: Water Heating  | 
Integrated storage solar collector (4' x 8') EF ~ 2.4  | 
Integrated storage solar collector (4' x 8') EF ~ 4.7  | 
 
| Solar: Water Heating  | 
Solar pool heater  | 
N/A - no pool  | 
 
| Solar: Attic Ventilation  | 
PV powered attic fan  | 
N/A - Unvented attic  | 
 
| Solar: Outdoor Lighting  | 
PV (low-voltage) patio lighting  | 
N/A - no pool | 
 
| Heating | 
Hydronic coil with solar heated water and gas backup  | 
Hydronic coil with solar heated water and instantaneous
                      gas backup  | 
 
| Cooling | 
SEER 14 AC 
                      Variable speed AHU fan  
                      Maintains indoor RH =< 60%  | 
Dual compressor SEER 17 
                      Variable speed AHU fan 
                      Maintains indoor RH =<60%  | 
 
| Ducts | 
Interior Duct System  
                      Fur down construction | 
Interior Duct System in Unvented Attic  | 
 
| Duct Leakage  | 
CFM25out < 5%
                      of AHU flow  | 
CFM25out <5% of AHU flow  | 
 
| Roof/Ceiling Assembly  | 
Radiant barrier roof decking 
                      R-30 dense pack cellulose (ceiling)  | 
R-20 Icynene at roof decking unvented attic  | 
 
| Wall Assembly  | 
R-13 Dense pack cellulose  | 
R-15 Blown in batt fiberglass | 
 
| Windows | 
Reduced window area  | 
  | 
 
| Glazing & Frame | 
Double pane, vinyl frame  | 
Same | 
 
| Window Radiant Gain  | 
Large overhangs (high windows located beneath the roof
                      overhangs to provide daylighting without contributing to
                      solar heat gain)  | 
Low-E glazing for unshaded east and west windows  | 
 
| Lighting | 
85% fluorescent.  | 
95% fluorescent | 
 
| Infiltration | 
Natural
                      ACH <0.1  | 
Est. natural ach =0.059  | 
 
| Ventilation | 
Filtered passive fresh air inlet on the return side of
                      AHU | 
Same | 
 
 
Florida Home Energy Rating Organization (Florida H.E.R.O.)
                  provided an engineered duct system for 26 models in the Regents
                  Park Townhouse development. This downtown urban infill project
                  will result in 54 units with Building America features including
                  ductwork in the conditioned space, outside air ventilation,
                and combo hydronic heat and 13 SEER cooling. 
- Applegren
                        Construction, Eastern Dakota Housing Alliance (EDHA)
 
 
EDHA set a goal of achieving up to 50% energy savings over
                  the 1993 Model Energy Code with superior indoor air quality
                  (AIQ). Phase I (March 2003) and Phase II (Feb 2004) each included
                two twin homes (duplexes) for a total of eight homes. 
 | 
 
  Figure 4  
                      Selkirk
                      Twin Homes, Grand Forks, ND.    | 
 
 
The two story dwellings (Figure 4) include an insulated
                  basement with air circulation to the main house, suitable for
                  conversion to living space. Features of the Phase I and Phase
                  II homes are summarized in Table 5 which also shows
                  a theoretical base case house using local conventional construction
                  and code minimums modeled in DOE2 to determine energy savings
                  and cost effectiveness. Estimated combined gas and electric
                  utility savings ranged from 25% on Phase I homes to 35% on
                  Phase II homes over the base case. The homes also met the BA
                  goal of 40% savings compared to the Benchmark house.  
 Annual
                  Energy Use 
A performance comparison of the base case and improved structures
                  is shown in Table 5. The DOE2 model predicts the need
                  for very little cooling, however many new homes in this area,
                  including these, are being built with central air conditioning. 
 Moisture Issues 
Phase II of construction added a layer of R-10 rigid extruded
                  polystyrene (XPS) to the exterior side of the wall assembly.
                  The low water vapor permeance of rigid XPS foam sheathing (1.1
                  perms) presents a dilemma in this climate where an interior
                  vapor barrier (usually 6-mil polyethylene) is considered mandatory
                  to minimize moisture diffusion from the conditioned space into
                  the wall cavity. The installation of two vapor barriers leaves
                  the wall vulnerable to moisture accumulation should water unintentionally
                  enters the cavity. One BAIHP recommendation calls for removing
                  the interior vapor barrier and relying on two coats of latex
                  paint on the interior to limit diffusion from the conditioned
                  space into the wall. This option allows the wall to dry to
                  some extent in both directions, but was not chosen by the builder. 
 Ventilation 
A heat recovery ventilator (HRV) mounted in the basement provides
                  controlled mechanical ventilation with an energy penalty estimated
                  at $45/year. The unit contains an 80-watt fan that introduces
                  75 CFM of outside air while exhausting a similar amount at
                  a heat transfer efficiency of 70%. The HRV can operate either
                  continuously or on an intermittent 20 minutes on, 40 minutes
                  off cycle. Intermittent operation was simulated to meet the
                  old guideline. Attempting to meet the new ASHRAE 62.2 standard
                  (ASHRAE 1999) would require 42 CFM of continuous ventilation.
                  For these simulations however, the old ASHRAE guideline of
                0.35ACH was used, calling for a continuous rate of 25 CFM.  
Table 5 Applegren
                          Twin Home Specifications   | 
 
Component  | 
Base Case   | 
Phase I (March 2003)  | 
Phase II (Feb 2004)   | 
 
Conditioned Area  
                      of Each Dwelling  | 
1840 sq. ft.  
                      (w/ basement)  | 
Same  | 
Same  | 
 
| Hers Score  | 
85.2  | 
89.7  | 
92.2  | 
 
| Estimated Annual Energy Cost  | 
$1179  | 
$815  | 
$701  | 
 
| % Cost Savings Compared to Base  | 
 | 
25%  | 
35%  | 
 
| Heating Cost  | 
$458  | 
$366  | 
$294  | 
 
| Cooling Cost  | 
$15  | 
$11  | 
$10  | 
 
| Hot Water Cost  | 
$245  | 
$157  | 
$116  | 
 
| H/C/WH Total Cost  | 
$718  | 
$534  | 
$420  | 
 
| Envelope | 
 
Above-Grade 
                      Wall Structure  | 
2x6 wood frame   | 
Same  | 
2x4 wood frame   | 
 
Above-Grade 
                      Wall Insulation  | 
R-19 fiberglass batt   | 
Same  | 
R-15 blown fiberglass   | 
 
Above-Grade 
                      Wall Sheathing  | 
Plywood  | 
Same  | 
R10
                          XPS foam corners: R7.5+ plywood   | 
 
| Basement Walls  | 
R-11  | 
Same  | 
Same  | 
 
| Vented Attic  | 
R-49  | 
Same  | 
Same  | 
 
| Windows | 
Double pane, Low-E, Argon-Filled,
                           
                          vinyl slider frame 
                          U=0.34, SHGC=0.33  
  | 
Casement 
                      (instead of slider)   | 
Same as Phase I   | 
 
Infiltration (ACH50) 
                      (Including Basement) | 
5 (assumed)   | 
2.8 (average of 4 units)   | 
2.4
                      (average of 4 units)  | 
 
| Equipment | 
 
| Gas Furnace | 
60 kBtu, AFUE=78  | 
60 kBtu, AFUE=92 
                      w/ sealed combustion   | 
60 kBtu, AFUE=92  | 
 
| Gas Furnace Capacity  | 
29.8 kBtu/h   | 
33.4 kBtu/h   | 
30.7 kBtu/h   | 
 
| Air Conditioner | 
1.5 ton, 10 SEER   | 
Same  | 
Same  | 
 
| Air Conditioner Capacity  | 
9.9 kBtu/h   | 
10.6 kBtu/h   | 
10.3 kBtu/h   | 
 
| Thermostat | 
Standard  | 
Programmable  | 
Same as Phase I   | 
 
| Ventilation | 
None  | 
70% efficient HRV   | 
Same as Phase I   | 
 
| Water Heater  | 
40 gallon,  
                      EF=0.88 Electric   | 
40 gallon, EF=0.62 
                        Natural gas with power vent
                      | 
Tankless, EF=0.83 
                      Natural gas
                        | 
 
| Lighting | 
10% fluorescent  | 
85% fluorescent (linear and CFL) Note:
                      only bathroom and dimmable fixtures were incandescent)   | 
Same as Phase I   | 
 
| Appliances | 
Standard  | 
Energy Star dishwasher 
                      Horizontal-axis washer 
                      Energy Star refrigerator  | 
Same as Phase I   | 
 
 
 Cost Analysis 
 Tables
                      6 (Phase I) and 7 (Phase 2) show the
                  cumulative effect of All Measures in comparison to
                  the base case home. The heat recovery ventilator (HRV) is also
                  shown separate from the other measures because the HRV is an
                  essential IAQ feature, yet it increases energy use by $45/year.
                  With the exception of the HRV all measures show a positive
                  cash flow on a 6%, 30 year fixed rate mortgage beginning in
                  the first year. 
Table 6 Economic
                          Assessment of Phase I Measures***   | 
 
Energy Measure   | 
Annual  
                      Savings   | 
Installed  
                      Cost   | 
Simple  
                      Payback   | 
First Year  
                      Cash Flow   | 
 
| Reduce infiltration to 2.8 ACH50  | 
$90  | 
$325  | 
3.6  | 
$68  | 
 
| Upgrade to 92% direct vent furnace  | 
$52  | 
$600  | 
11.5  | 
$11  | 
 
| Switch to Programmable Thermostat | 
$23  | 
$130  | 
5.7  | 
$11  | 
 
| Upgrade to Energy Star appliances*  | 
$61  | 
$730  | 
12  | 
$12  | 
 
| Change to EF=0.62 power vented water heater  | 
$52  | 
$520  | 
10  | 
$16  | 
 
| Increase from 10% to 85% fluorescent lighting  | 
$31  | 
$200  | 
6.5  | 
$17  | 
 
| All Measures  | 
$309  | 
$2,505  | 
8.1  | 
$135  | 
 
Heat recovery ventilation @75cfm,  
                      33% RTF  | 
($45)  | 
$1,400  | 
N/A  | 
($134)  | 
 
| All Measures with HRV  | 
$264  | 
$3,905  | 
14.8  | 
$1  | 
 
* Energy Star appliances include refrigerator, dishwasher and h-axis clothes
washer. 
                      ** First year cash flow based on 30 year
                      fixed rate mortgage with interest rate of 6%, down payment
                      of 5%, and discount rate of 5%. A general inflation rate
                      of 3% per year was applied to the upgrade cost of measures
                      replaced at end of lifetime. Final value of equipment is
                      determined by linear depreciation over lifetime. Interest
                      paid on mortgage is considered tax deductible using a tax
                      rate of 28%. Energy costs escalate at 3% per year. A property
                      tax rate of 0.8% was applied to the energy upgrade cost
                      and is inflated at 3% per year.  | 
 
 
The
                  higher savings of Phase II over Phase I arise from two energy
                  saving measures unusual for this region: XPS foam sheathing
                  with 2x4 framing and tankless gas water heating. Simple paybacks
                  for these measures were 8.3 and 13.3 years respectively. Electric
                  water heaters are the current norm in the Grand Forks area,
                  but with electricity 26% below the national average and natural
                  gas prices on the rise, simple payback on the tankless model
                  was relatively long. In addition, fluctuating natural gas prices
                  complicate the economic analysis. Initial concerns of how the
                  tankless water heater would perform in this extreme climate
                  were met with positive feedback through the first winter, which
                  was colder than normal including an all-time record low of
                  -44ºF set at the Grand Forks International Airport on
                January 30, 2004. 
Table
                            7 Economic Assessment of Phase II Measures   | 
 
Energy
                            Measure   | 
Annual  
        Savings   | 
Installed  
        Cost   | 
Simple  
        Payback   | 
First
                            Year  
        Cash Flow   | 
 
| Upgrade walls to (R10 sheath + R15 FG batt)  | 
$72  | 
$600  | 
8.3  | 
$31  | 
 
| Reduce
                        infiltration to 2.4 ACH50  | 
$106  | 
$325  | 
3.1  | 
$82  | 
 
| Upgrade
                        to 92% direct vent furnace  | 
$40  | 
$600  | 
15.0  | 
-$1  | 
 
| Switch
                        to Programmable Thermostat | 
$18  | 
$130  | 
7.2  | 
$6  | 
 
| Upgrade
                        to Energy Star appliances*  | 
$60  | 
$730  | 
12.2  | 
$12  | 
 
| Change
                        to EF=0.83 tankless gas water heater  | 
$94  | 
$1,250  | 
13.3  | 
$10  | 
 
| Increase
                        from 10% to 85% fluorescent lighting  | 
$31  | 
$200  | 
6.5  | 
$18  | 
 
| All
                          Measures  | 
$421  | 
$3,835  | 
9.1  | 
$158  | 
 
Heat
                        recovery ventilation @75cfm, 
      33% RTF  | 
($43)  | 
$1,400  | 
N/A  | 
($134)  | 
 
| All
                          Measures with HRV  | 
$378  | 
$5,235  | 
13.8  | 
$24  | 
 
 
Four more dwellings (two duplexes) are slated for completion
                  in the summer of 2004. See also Cold Climate Case Study:
                High Efficiency North Dakota Twin Homes on  www.baihp.org . 
- Atlantic Design and Construction 
 
 
 Atlantic
                    Design & Construction (AD&C) is a production
                  builder located in Gainesville, Florida, who builds about 50
                  homes a year. Though initially producing homes better than
                  the Florida Energy Code minimum, Florida HERO worked with AD&C
                  to increase their efficiency to Energy Star and then to Building
                  America standards. (Table 8). The new upgrades resulted
                in homes achieving an average HERS score of 89.  
 | 
 
  Figure 5 Atlantic
                      Design and Construction  
                      home in the Mentone neighborhood.   | 
 
 
Savings
                    from the increased the cooling system efficiency more than
                    offset the additional $250 to $375 needed for improved duct
                    sealing and insulation and air sealing protocol adjustments.
                    This savings, while sufficient to offset those costs, were
                    not enough to pay for all implemented measures. Instead,
                    increasing the price of the home by $1,250 was sufficient
                    to cover the additional costs and derive an excellent profit
                    margin. Despite adding $1,250 to $2,500 to home buyer costs
                    up-front, AD&C's
                  award-winning development, Mentone, has been the best-selling
                  subdivision in Alachua County for four years running (Figure
                  5). 
Kenny
                    Brekenridge, AD&C Project Manager,
                    says that the company believes with energy costs continuing
                    to rise that it makes sense to build energy efficient, and
                    that they emphasize the Building America improvements in
                their sales literature and discussions. 
Table
                          8 Atlantic Design and Construction Specifications   | 
 
Component  | 
Original  | 
Mentone  | 
 
Conditioned Area   | 
1800-2400 sq. ft   | 
 1800-2400
                          sq. ft   | 
 
Hers Score   | 
~82   | 
~89   | 
 
Selling Price   | 
~$90,000   | 
$190,000 - $325,000   | 
 
Cooling   | 
SEER 10 with standard thermostat   | 
System sized using Manual
                        J, SEER 13 with passive, filtered ventilation air and
                        programmable thermostat   | 
 
Ducts   | 
Local conventional construction   | 
System
                          engineered using manual d, mastic sealed, and performance
                          tested to have cfm25out < 5%
                        of AHU flow   | 
 
Ceiling Insulation   | 
R-30 fiberglass   | 
R-30 cellulose   | 
 
Wall Assembly   | 
R-11 fiberglass   | 
R-13 cellulose   | 
 
Windows   | 
Double pane clear metal frame   | 
Double pane Low-E   | 
 
Lighting   | 
Standard   | 
Air lock can lights   | 
 
 
In
                  the summer of 2003, Avis American Homes tested an alpha prototype
                  Status and Control System (STACS) developed by the UCF Constructability
                  Lab researchers (BAIHP Partner). The system is a real-time
                  shop floor labor data collection and reporting system. Production
                  workers use wireless laser scanners to report their current
                  work assignment. STACS reporting is web based and provides
                  both real time manufacturing status and summaries of historical
                  production performance (Figure 6). While labor represents
                  a relatively modest fraction of production cost, typically
                  10-15%, it has a profound impact on operations, including product
                  quality, cycle time, material waste, and labor productivity.  
 | 
 
                       Figure 6 STACS system
                      components and relationships.   | 
 
 
Avis American employees tested STACS in drywall finishing
                  operations. Test results demonstrated that production workers
                  could operate the system effectively and that the system accurately
                  captured scanned activity.  
See also Penn Lyon Homes (Technical Assistance section)
                  and Status and Control System (STACS) (Research Section
                III). 
  |