|   | 
 
 | 
 
|   | 
 
| Reference
                             Publication:   
                        Chandra, Subrato, Neil Moyer, Danny Parker, David Beal,
                        David Chasar, Eric Martin, Janet McIlvaine, Ross McCluney,
                        Andrew Gordon, Mike Lubliner, Mike McSorley, Ken Fonorow,
                        Mike Mullens, Mark McGinley, Stephanie Hutchinson, David
                        Hoak, Stephen Barkaszi, Carlos Colon, John Sherwin, and
                        Rob Vieira. Building America Industrialized Housing
                        Partnership, Annual Report - Fifth Budget Period. 4/1/03
                        - 3/31/04. | 
 
 
   | 
 
 | 
 
  
|   Building
                                America Industrialized Housing Partnership, Annual
                                Report - Fifth Budget Period  | 
 
 
  | 
 
 | 
 
  
 Subrato
                                 Chandra, Neil
                                  Moyer, Danny
                                   Parker, David
                                    Beal, David
                                     Chasar, Eric
                                      Martin, 
Janet
                                       McIlvaine, Ross
                                        McCluney, Andrew
                                         Gordon, Mike
                                          Lubliner, Mike McSorley, 
Ken
                                           Fonorow, Mike
                                            Mullens, Mark
                                             McGinley, Stephanie
                                              Hutchinson, David
                                               Hoak,    
                            Stephen
         Barkaszi, Carlos
                            Colon, John
                            Sherwin,
                            and Rob Vieira  | 
 
 | 
 
|   Florida 
                            Solar Energy Center  | 
 
 
  | 
 
|   | 
 
 | 
 
 
| 
 Florida H.E.R.O. discussed a range of issues with Bellview
                    Air, including the impact of input data on Manual J equipment
                    sizing and the air handler location in an effort to improve
                    indoor air quality, comfort, and energy performance. The
                    potential benefits of unvented cathedralized roof systems
                  were also addressed. Construction anticipated in 2005. 
This BAIHP partnership resulted in monitored field research
                    in the Augusta Building America model (Figure 7) and
                    a control home. See BAIHP Research (Section III), Site
                  Built Housing Research, Cambridge Homes. 
 | 
 
Figure
                                                7 The Augusta,  
        Cambridge Homes BA Prototype.   | 
 
 
 During the 4 th budget period in cooperation with the University
                    of Central Florida Industrial Engineering Department (UCFIE),
                    FSEC researchers tested four Cardinal modular homes with
                    the Cardinal sales manager and plant quality engineer. Initial
                    results found that peak loads for heating were almost double
                    that for cooling. All four of the homes had leaky ducts.
                    These leaks accounted for the largest peak load in the homes,
                  averaging 28% of the winter peak and 21% of the summer peak.  
 Champion Homes built the first stress skin insulated panel
                    (SIP) manufactured home now sited in western Washington.
                    The house air tightness was measured at ACH50=3.55, well
                    below the average numbers for all homes previously tested
                    in the WSU random home study (see Northwest Energy Efficient
                    Manufactured Homes). Energy savings are estimated at 50%
                    greater than a home constructed to the HUD Code. These results
                    were presented at the 2003 ASHRAE Summer Meeting, authored
                    by Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), with contributions
                  from BAIHP staff.  
- City
                        of Gainesville, Cedar Grove II
 
 
 | 
 
 Figure 8 City of Gainesville
                             
                      house in Cedar Grove II.   | 
 
  Florida
                      H.E.R.O. began working with the City of Gainesville before
                      the ground-breaking in the Cedar Grove II subdivision of
                      HUD housing. Project manager Judy Raymond envisioned a
                      new urban style development (HUD’s first) with single
                    family homes featuring high quality construction and individualized
                    character with front porches and front façade details (Figure
                    8). She worked with Florida H.E.R.O. to develop engineered
                    plans for mechanical and air distribution systems and a whole
                    house package that was recognized with a HUD award in 2004. Table
                  9 summarizes the specifications. 
Table 9 City
                          of Gainesville, Cedar Grove II Subdivision, HUD Home  | 
 
Component   | 
Specification   | 
 
Conditioned Area   | 
~1200-1400 (139 units)   | 
 
HERS Rating   | 
86-88 (goal = 86)   | 
 
Cooling And Heating   | 
SEER 12 with hydronic heating;
                          some 80% AFUE furnaces with programmable thermostat.   | 
 
Duct System   | 
Ducts in conditioned space.
                          Ducts moved to attic in later phase. Return duct and
                          air handler still conditioned space. 
Duct
                              system engineered using Manual D, sealed with mastic,
                              all homes performance tested for duct air tightness.
                            CFM25 out≈25 
 | 
 
System Capacity   | 
Cooling and heating systems
                          sized using Manual J calculation procedure   | 
 
Walls   | 
R-13 cellulose   | 
 
Ceiling   | 
R-30 cellulose insulation
                          with radiant barrier   | 
 
Windows   | 
Double pane metal frame   | 
 
 
- City
                                of Orlando, The Orlando House
 
 
 | 
 
 Figure 9 TheOrlando
                            House. 
  | 
 
 
The City of Orlando, through the office of Housing and Community
                    Development in the Planning and Development Department, constructed
                    an environmentally friendly demonstration home called TheOrlando
                    House: Florida’s Future, on an infill site within
                    the city (Figure 9). The City requested FSEC assistance
                    to assure the home met Building America goals and the Florida
                    Green Home Designation Standards. Ground broke on the demonstration
                    home in December 2001 and the home was open to the public
                    for community education purposes for approximately one year.
                    Specifications are listed in Table 10. 
The City acquired more than $100,000 in donated materials
                    and services for the project, and completed much of the construction
                    using their own staff. Along with public education, a primary
                    purpose for this project was to give the city staff first
                    hand experience in the use of green building materials and
                    techniques - especially those relating to energy efficiency,
                    indoor air quality, durability, disaster mitigation, and
                    termite resistance. That experience would allow the products
                    and techniques to be effectively used in future low-income
                    housing constructed by the city.  
One particular focus of this project was disaster resistance.
                    For protection from wind storms, a durable steel structure
                    was used along with a safe room located in the detached garage.
                    For termite resistance, all structural and exterior finish
                    materials were selected on the basis of providing the least
                    amount of available food source. Materials such as borate
                    treated lumber and sheathing, steel structural components,
                    and plastic/composite finishes were used extensively in conjunction
                    with a Termi-mesh barrier system. 
FSEC
                      certified the house for the Florida Green Home Designation
                      Standard in February 2003. FSEC staff also presented information
                      regarding Florida Green Home Designation as part of a builder
                      training event held at the Orlando House. Two CEUs were
                      available to attendees, and approx. 30 people attended
                      from the central Florida area. Training also included talks
                      on Zero Energy Homes, Florida Sun Built Program, and a “builder panel” that
                    included 3 BAIHP partner builders.  
The demonstration home was sold in May 2003, and money acquired
                    from the sale will go directly towards the construction of
                    low income housing that utilizes several green building techniques. 
Table 10 City
                            of Orlando - Orlando House   | 
 
Component  | 
Specifications  | 
 
| Conditioned Area  | 
2148 sq. ft.  | 
 
| HERS Score  | 
88.3 | 
 
| Envelope | 
 
| Above-grade Wall Structure  | 
Steel Frame 1st and 2nd floors  | 
 
| Above-grade Wall Insulation  | 
R-19 Icynene  | 
 
| Exterior Wall and Roof Sheathing  | 
OSB - Borate treated  | 
 
| Attic | 
Unvented R-19 Icynene  | 
 
| Roof | 
Metal | 
 
| Windows | 
Double pane Low-E  | 
 
| Equipment | 
 
| Heating & Cooling  | 
13 SEER heat pump  | 
 
| Thermostat | 
Programmable | 
 
| Ventilation | 
Passive outside air vent  | 
 
| Water Heater  | 
50 gal, EF = 0.88 (Electric)  | 
 
| Lighting | 
100% fluorescent  | 
 
| Appliances | 
Energy Star  | 
 
Additional Green Features:  
- Termi-mesh
 
- Safe Room
 
- VOC source control
 
- Resource efficient interior finishes 
 
  | 
- Durable exterior finishes
 
- Ultra-low-flow water fixtures
 
- Low water using landscape
 
- Pervious driveway/walkway   
 
  | 
 
 
  
- City of Lubbock Community Development
 
 
 | 
 
  Figure 10 Low
                            income housing  
                          built by the City of Lubbock  
                          using
                    insulated concrete forms.   | 
 
 
Through
                      the Portland Cement Association (PCA), contact was established
                      with the City of Lubbock who is building low income houses
                      with insulated concrete form (ICF) systems (Figure
                    10). FSEC researchers visited Lubbock twice to conduct
                    diagnostic tests and provide training and technical assistance.
                    FSEC also conducted initial HERS ratings on four Lubbock
                    Habitat for Humanity (see Habitat for Humanity, Texas) homes
                    plans and introduced the Habitat affiliate to the City of
                  Lubbock’s other low-income housing activities.  
  
 FSEC personnel conducted a plant visit of the Clayton Homes
                    factory in Waycross, Georgia in June 2002. A singlewide home
                    was tested and observations recorded of home and duct construction
                    techniques. Findings and remedies for leaky ducts found during
                    the visit were reported to factory representatives in a follow-up
                  trip report (see Appendix A).  
  | 
 
 
 
 
Disclaimer: 
            This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency 
            of the United States government. Neither the United States government 
            nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, 
            express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility 
            for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, 
            apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use 
            would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any 
            specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, 
            manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply 
            its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States 
            government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors 
            expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the 
            United States government or any agency thereof.  
  
 |