Building America HomeBuilding America Industrialized Housing PartnershipBAIHP - Conducted by FSEC Building America Home You are here: > BAIHP > Publications > BAIHP Yr. 6 Annual > Tech Assist (S)
FSEC Online Publications
Reference Publication:   Chandra, Subrato, Neil Moyer, Danny Parker, David Beal, David Chasar, Eric Martin, Janet McIlvaine, Ross McCluney, Andrew Gordon, Mike Lubliner, Mike McSorley, Ken Fonorow, Mike Mullens, Mark McGinley, Stephanie Hutchinson, David Hoak, Stephen Barkaszi, Carlos Colon, John Sherwin, Rob Vieira, and Susan Wichers. Building America Industrialized Housing Partnership, Annual Report - Sixth Budget Period. 4/1/04 - 3/31/05.
Building America Industrialized Housing Partnership, Annual Report - Sixth Budget Period

II. BAIHP Technical Assistance (S)

  • Sandspur Housing
    Maitland, Florida
    Category B

Since 2002, FSEC staff have been working with Sandspur Housing, the largest affordable home builder in the nation. Sandspur constructs approximately 4,000 apartment units per year, primarily in Florida and Georgia. The company’s primary interest in Building America is in receiving assistance for designing low energy-use units with good indoor air quality and resolving recurrent moisture problems in Florida’s hot-humid climate. Contact with Sandspur was initiated by BAIHP subcontractor Florida H.E.R.O. in Gainesville, Florida.

Sandspur Housing staff were taken on a tour of the David Hoak demonstration home to show specific equipment and the role it plays in an overall systems engineering approach. After the tour, discussions continued on the Landing Community analysis. This allowed personnel to view firsthand some of the Building America principles and practices so that they could explain these concepts to others in the Sandspur organization.

BAIHP has worked with Sandspur in three Florida cities: Naples, Orlando, and Gainesville.

Naples, Florida

For Camden Cove, Sandspur’s community in Naples, BAIHP researchers conducted an energy analysis on all individual units and several apartment buildings slated for construction in 2003 and 2004. Information from Sandspur’s building plans was combined with Florida H.E.R.O.’s field experience in Sandspur's Gainesville apartment complex Harbor Cove Community. Results indicated an opportunity to cost-effectively reduce energy use/cost in a 16-unit apartment building by more than 20% while improving indoor air quality and durability. Since Sandspur was already building fairly tight duct systems, savings potential in this area was already being achieved. Additionally, heating and cooling loads in multi-dwelling buildings are lower than similar size and construction single family detached housing because there are fewer exterior surfaces.

Energy efficiency recommendations included:

  • Switching to 75% fluorescent lighting
  • Reducing duct leakage to the outside to 3% (Qn out ≤ 0.03)
  • Reducing window area to 6% of floor area
  • Window shading strategies to provide overall solar heat gain coefficient of 0.2
  • Installing ducts inside the conditioned space
  • SEER 13.0 cooling systems
  • White metal roofing or radiant barrier
  • Programmable thermostats
  • Ceiling fans in all bedrooms and main living areas

Air quality improvement strategies focused on including:

  • Pleated return air filters rated with an Minimum Efficiency Reporting Value (MERV) of 11
  • Filtered mechanical ventilation of 7.5 CFM/person + 0.01 CFM/ft 2
  • Supplemental dehumidification
  • Quiet, energy efficient bathroom exhaust fans with timer switches (≤0.3 watts/ft 3)
  • Quiet, energy efficient vented kitchen range hoods in each unit

A summary of all analysis results and building design features was prepared and submitted to Sandspur Housing. Two meetings were held to review the recommendations.

Orlando Moisture Investigations

FSEC staff tested four Sandspur-built apartment units and installed datalogging equipment in six units at the Landings Community in Orlando where some units had reported moisture problems. Measured envelope leakage was typical for new construction, and all but one unit had very tight duct systems. Dataloggers (stand alone temperature RH loggers) were deployed in the air handler of each unit to record interior moisture levels. Three weeks of data were plotted for six apartments as temperature, relative humidity, and dew point. Ambient weather data from the nearby Hoak house datalogger was included and compared favorably with published Orlando airport weather.

To continue investigating the cause of excess moisture in the apartment units, datalogging equipment was installed in six additional units. To remedy problems, prototype schemes were evaluated such as utilizing a humidistat in conjunction with thermostat, and installation of a dedicated dehumidifier. Data analysis will be completed in 2004.

Gainesville, Florida Brookside Apartment Complex

During the 5 th budget period, work was completed on testing and rating all 176 units in Sandspur’s Energy Star apartment complex Brookside in Gainesville, FL. Apartment features are given in Table 21. Each apartment was individually tested for envelope and duct air tightness as well as flow through the passive outdoor air system by Bob Abernethy, FSEC technician, in collaboration with Florida H.E.R.O. Results are listed in Table 21 below. The complex consists of one to four bedroom models grouped into two-story buildings of eight to 16 units.

Table 21 Brookside Apartments Characteristics

Component

Description

Conditioned area

1 Bedroom unit =717 sq. ft.
2 Bedroom unit = 990 sq. ft.
3 Bedroom unit = 1313 sq. ft.
4 Bedroom unit = 1582 sq. ft.

HERS Score

86.1 - 87.7

Mechanical and System

Interior air handler
Fresh air ventilation
Engineered and right sized systems
Engineered duct design

Fresh Air Ventilation

4” fresh air duct provides 34 to 45 cfm to house side of HVAC filter when mechanical system is running. Manual damper provided.

Heating

Hydronic heat coils fed by a conventional gas water heater in an exterior closet

Cooling

SEER 12 AC - was SEER 10
1 and 2 Bedroom units = 1.5 Ton - was 2-2.5 Ton
3 and 4 Bedroom Units = 2 Ton - was 2.5-3 Ton

Ducts

Mastic sealed and tested

Duct Leakage

CFM25 out < 5% of AHU flow

Wall insulation

Unfaced fiberglass batt (first cost savings of $0.22/sq ft and reduced site labor)

Windows

.

Glazing & Frame

.

Cary Park, North Carolina

BAIHP researcher compared two energy savings improvements: (1)upgrade from SEER-10 to SEER-11, and (2) add a programmable thermostat to the SEER-10 unit.

Analysis

The Groves at Cary Park Apartments include a group of five buildings with 12 units each for a total of 120 units. A detailed computer simulation analysis was performed on a single, representative unit to compare the two energy saving measures using Energy Gauge USA version 2.3, which is based on the DOE2.1E simulation engine. The apartment chosen was a top floor 2-bedroom unit with north-facing windows since these units make up 50% of the complex whereas the remaining 1, 3 and 4 bedroom units make up 17%, 20% and 13% respectively and because the top floor 1 and 2 bedroom apartments are the only ones with exposure to an attic space over their entire floor area. The top floor 3 and 4 bedroom apartments are only partially exposed to an attic space while the remainder (about half the floor area) is below a 1-bedroom unit. The added attic exposure increases the heating and cooling loads on the top floor 1 and 2 bedroom units and is likely to present a worse-case scenario in terms of space conditioning load per square foot.

An hourly computer simulation of a top floor 2-bedroom apartment with north-facing windows was performed using TMY weather data for Raleigh, North Carolina. Four of the five buildings shown on the site plan are oriented at or very near to an east-west axis, causing the majority of windows to have either north or south exposures. The fifth building is oriented on a north-south axis. Specifications as taken from the plans provided are listed in Table 22.

Table 22 2-Bedroom Apartment Specifications

Conditioned Area

1,081 sq.ft.

Walls

Wood Frame (R-13)

Ventilated Attic

R-30

Roof

Dark shingles, 1:300 ventilation

Floor

R-99 (to simulate no load)

Double Pane Vinyl Windows

U-0.57, clear glass

Infiltration

5.0 ACH50, or 0.183 ACH

Ducts

R-6, Qn-0.06, 9.4% air loss

Thermostat

Non-programmable

Setpoints

Cooling 75°F, Heating 70°F

Lighting

10% Fluorescent

Ventilation

none

SEER-10

The HVAC schedule in the building plans specifies a Carrier 38YKC024 heat pump compressor and FF1CN024 air handler for the 2-bedroom apartments. Literature downloaded from the Carrier website lists this combination as having efficiency ratings of SEER-10.3 for cooling and HSPF-7.0 for heating.

SEER-11

Product data on the 38YKC shows that several other air handler models (most of which are variable speed) can be used to achieve a SEER rating of 11 or higher and can boost the HSPF to 7.2. These efficiency ratings were compared against the SEER-10 unit in an hourly simulation and showed a savings of 138 kWh/year or $12/year at an electric utility rate of $0.0826/kWh.

SEER-10 plus Programmable Thermostat

Estimated savings from using a programmable thermostat in conjunction with the SEER-10 heat pump slightly exceeded the savings from going to the SEER 11 efficiency upgrade alone and showed a savings of 177 kWh/year or $15/year. A 3 °F temperature difference was used for a nighttime heating set-back from 11pm to 7am and daytime cooling set-up from 9am to 3pm.

Table 23 Estimated Annual Heating and Cooling Energy Use

.

SEER-10.3 / HSPF-7.0

SEER-11 / HSPF-7.2

SEER-10.3 w/prog.t-stat

Heating kWh

1,542

1,511

1,397

Cooling kWh

2,006

1,899

1,974

Total kWh

3,548

3,410

3,371

Annual Savings ($)*

.

$12

$15

*Estimated annual savings based on electric utility rate of $0.0826/kWh

Conclusion

While it appears from the Carrier literature that the cooling efficiency on this heat pump model can be brought to SEER-11 by upgrading only the air handler, equivalent or better savings can also be obtained by employing a modest (3 °F) set-back/set-up schedule with a programmable thermostat.

  • Southern Energy Homes
    Addison, Alabama
    Category D, 12,803 Homes
    Technical Assistance by BAIHP Researchers Neil Moyer and David Beal
    Trip Report
Figure 39 Southern Energy Homes quality control engineer conducts in-plant duct leakage test.

During the 1 st budget period, BAIHP held a meeting to introduce Building America to the industry. Representatives from Southern Energy Homes attended in hopes of finding solutions to moisture problems they were experiencing in coastal areas. In 2000, BAIHP researchers conducted building science diagnostics in several moisture damaged homes in coastal Louisiana and found contributing factors to be duct leakage and inadequate return air pathways from bed rooms.

Southern Energy Homes took steps to achieve substantially leak free duct systems in all their homes. They switched from UL 181 approved tapes to mastic and fiberglass mesh for forming component connections in all their duct systems and began testing duct systems during production (Figure 39).

In 2002 FSEC received a request to certify the Southern Energy Homes (SEH) factory in Addison, Alabama for Energy Star compliance. A plant visit in August 2001 examined opportunities to enhance manufacturing productivity. Three model homes were tested for Energy Star certification, recommendations were made, and Energy Star plant certification paperwork submitted to US EPA.

In 2003 discussions continued with SEH plant personnel for conducting an analysis at one of their factories using the UCFIE simulation tool. On January 27 and 28, FSEC conducted site visits and performed diagnostic tests on several problem homes and submitted recommendations in a trip report in February. Based on these recommendations, FSEC conducted duct test training for factory personnel in four Southern Energy Homes factories.

In May of 2003 FSEC certified a Southern Energy Homes factory for EnergyStar production. FSEC conducted diagnostic field visits to Southern Energy homes in December 2003 and January of 2004 and provided recommendations in trip reports. Infrared inspection of the recommended retrofits were done in April 2004.

In 2004 two Moisture related home inspections were done, the first in August and the second in September. Recommendations were made in trip reports.

  • Spain Construction
    Gainesville, Florida
    Category B, 33 Homes

In the 6 th budget period an evaluation of a homeowner complaint of significant condensation on the interior of the windows was made. Recommendations made were the installation of a passive outside air system which solved “95%” of the problem according to the homeowner, and the use of independent dehumidification to eliminate the rest.

Florida H.E.R.O. worked with Spain Construction in the 5th reporting period to address a homeowner comfort complaint and to assist the builder’s mechanical contractor in designing a distribution system in a new Willowcraft community custom home. Diagnostic tests and Manual J calculations performed for the homeowner complaint determined that the mechanical system was oversized by one ton. In addition to the air handler filter, the researcher also located a second filter at the return grill. The homeowner was unaware of this filter, so its replacement significantly improved the system airflow. Florida HERO recommended the introduction of outside air to the return side of the system to facilitate positive pressurization and to slightly increase the load and diminish some of the effects of oversizing.

The builder has improved his specifications from standard code compliance (SEER 10, single pane windows, etc.) to HERS ratings of 87.5 - 89.4 for 100% of his homes. They feature SEER 13 air conditioning, double pane vinyl frame with low-E glass (SHGC of .34), air handler in conditioned space, R-30 ceiling and R-13 wall cellulose insulation. A few homes had ducts in conditioned space.

Stylecrest Sales, formerly called Coleman HVAC Systems, is a major provider of mechanical system components to the manufactured housing industry. IN helping various home manufacturers resolve duct leakage issues, BAIHP has worked extensively with the engineering staff at Stylecrest to resolve such problems as dimensional coordination of duct components, assembly procedures, and standards in duct joining recommendations.

BAIHP researchers also met with Stylecrest Sales to discuss Energy Star plant/home certification procedures and collected cost data for a variety of HVAC system sizes. In 2004, FSEC visited a moisture damaged home in Port Fouchon (LA) at the request of Stylecrest that was built by Southern Energy Homes using Stylecrest components. (See Section III, Research, Moisture Damaged Homes.)


Disclaimer: This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States government or any agency thereof.

Home | Overview | Activities | Team Members | Case Studies
Current Data | Publications | Researchers | Contact Us


Copyright © 2004 Florida Solar Energy Center. All Rights Reserved.

Please address questions and comments regarding this web page to BAIHPMaster